Driver of Returns: Inflation

Through this piece, I wanted to share some of my knowledge on inflation as a driver of asset returns, and its outlook.

Driver of Returns:

On a fundamental level, inflation affects the price of future consumption, and thus how we behave as consumers. If the price of something is expected to rise in the future, we would naturally tend to gravitate more towards buying it today. In investing terms, it affects the rate at which we would be required to hold cash rather than consume it. In other words, we need to get a sufficient return on our investment that would persuade us to hold our money there, as opposed to spending that money now.

Although I have not back-tested it myself, research from firms like Bridgewater Associates, and Hedgeye Risk Management, have concluded that alongside economic growth, inflation is one of the two most important macroeconomic factors that drive asset returns. With that being said, I look forward to being able to back-test the data myself once I gain the necessary skills.

Effect on Particular Asset Classes:

What typically works within different inflationary environments?

Rising Inflation:

  • TIPS (or other inflation protected bonds)
  • Commodities

Falling Inflation

  • Equities*
  • Nominal Bonds**
  • US Dollar

*Equities are a special case because they are largely dependent on economic growth. In environments with slowing growth AND falling inflation, we have seen two market crashes in the past two years (Q4 2018 & Q1 2020).

**Similar to equities, nominal bonds, in particular US treasuries, are largely dependent on growth expectations. Even in a deflationary environment, if economic growth is projected to be strong, the price of treasuries and notes will not necessarily appreciate.

Current Inflation Cycle:

Figure 1: Core CPI
Figure 2: Headline CPI

Like GDP, inflation on a Y/Y basis behaves in sinusoidal-like way. This means you have cyclical peaks and troughs in inflation. This is more evident in the Core CPI number displayed in Figure 1, as its Headline Counterpart is far more volatile due to food and energy. At least for the near term, it seems highly improbable that we will retest or go lower than the lows we have experienced this year on a Y/Y basis. We had an extremely deflationary force in the economic shutdowns seen across the globe, so much so that it made crude oil futures go negative for May’s contract. As a result, the most likely scenario is higher Y/Y inflation for the following few quarters.

Data that helps point in this direction is given to us via the CRB Index. Given that its biggest weight is oil, it suffered an incredible drop all the way to April. However, since then it has had a strong upwards trend, and oil has similarly seen a strong price move paired with falling volatility (OVX). Given that the items in the CRB Index affect the cost of living of the people, it is at least worthy to be considered in this analysis. With strong momentum and inflation rising on a Y/Y basis, it is highly probable that the CRB Index continues to climb higher in the near term.

Figure 3

Lastly, I wanted to include this (M2) velocity of money chart. I included a much larger time series for this chart to provide additional context as to how unprecedented the current data is.

Money velocity and inflation are linked, so it will be key to watch if this data bounces for Q3 2020. The likelihood of the directional change in Y/Y inflation largely depends on this figure above.

Conclusion:

The biggest takeaway from this should be that the more probable scenario, at least in the next few quarters, is to see inflation rise on a Y/Y basis. I also want to highlight that this analysis was done without mentioning the recent Fed policy announcement, in which they stated that they would be more lenient in their inflation targets. When making these sorts of analyses, one wants to be able to front-run the Fed, and not just be at their whim.

Pre-COVID Slowdown

Context:

I wanted to work on this piece in order to provide context for the economic slowdown that was occurring before COVID-19 ever occurred. While the virus and the subsequent shutdown of the US economy are why we had such a poor Q/Q Q2 GDP number (-32.9%!), it would be wrong to assume that this downturn was not at a high likelihood of taking place. I will structure this piece by going over all the signs that pointed to the US economic downturn.

Key Words: rate of change

US GDP Curve:

In order to better understand global macro, one must understand the rate of change for factors such as economic growth. While the GDP curve does not perfectly mirror a sine curve, they undoubtedly share similarities, including the importance of rate of change. By studying and mapping the rate of change, we are able to gain insight on possible inflection points that inform us on the upcoming economic environment, e.g., recovery, expansion, recession, etc. In addition, I include the year/year (Y/Y) growth of GDP because it provides a more holistic and long-term view of US economic growth.

As an example of the cyclical nature of economic growth, we simply need to observe the image above. Before the recession dates, which are shaded in grey, there was ALWAYS a downwards sloping GDP curve (to varying degrees, but that is besides the point).

With that being said, as the data suggests, the cycle peaked in Q2 of 2018 on a Y/Y basis, and was trending down afterwards. Although this did not guarantee a recession, as seen with the peak in Q1 of 2015, it certainly raises the probability that such an economic environment occurs.

US Yields:

The Yield Curve (UST 10 Yr – UST 2 Yr) is an important figure to keep track off, as it provides great insight from investors to the state of the overall economy. As many of us have been taught in school, when the curve inverts, or in this example becomes negative, it becomes a sign that the probability has risen tremendously for an economic downturn. When the curve enters negative territory, it signals that investors are piling into the 10 Yr yield as opposed to its 2 Yr counterpart, and thus showing less confidence in the shorter term for the economy.

In the latest cycle, we have seen a steady downwards trend since 2014, and the curve itself briefly inverted in March of 2019. While COVID-19 came out of nowhere, and made the economic downturn worse than it otherwise would have been, it would be unwise to not look at such a timeless indicator.

Corporate Debt:

The image above demonstrates the upwards trend of corporate debt/GDP that the US has utilized in the past seventy years. Undoubtedly, it appears that the American economy has grown more dependent on leverage than ever before. Without going too much into detail, it is an undeniable fact that we had reached an all-time high in corporate leverage relative to GDP pre-COVID. Such high levels of leverage raise the chances of defaults, which then accumulate and create a detriment to the economy.

Global Trade Volume:

Christophe Barraud🛢 on Twitter: "In detail, CPB data (https://t ...
Hoisington Third Quarter Review worth reading | Juggling Dynamite

As mentioned in this article, (https://ourworldindata.org/trade-and-globalization), the sum of exports and imports is equivalent to over half of the world’s output. In other words, in our very globalized economy, looking at the volume of trade across the world is an important thing to look at. And like with the other topics in this piece, looking at the absolute values of it all provides minimal value in comparison to the rate of change of growth. While it was certainly exacerbated by the Trade War between the United States and China, trade had already been slowing. Combine the two, and Y/Y global trade growth was negative in 2019.

S&P 500 Growth & Earnings:

A couple key takeaways from this chart.

Firstly, the growth in revenue peaked at the same time as GDP growth did, unsurprisingly. Secondly, yet again we can see a downwards trend in revenues before Q1 of 2020. Like with all the negative YoY quarters on this data, they were all preceded by an already established downwards trend in growth. Thus proving yet again that these downturns do not come out of nowhere.

This chart provides an excellent follow-up to the previous example. As the top-line growth of companies decelerated, it makes sense why the earnings growth would also slow. While earnings growth peaked a quarter later, the same downwards trend emerged as with revenue growth. Even before COVID-19 hit the US economy in Q1 of 2020, there had already been a quarter of negative earnings growth in Q3 of 2019.

Corporate Profit Cycle:

As shown in the previous section, the ~500 companies representing the S&P 500 were experiencing slowing sales and earnings growth. Well, what about US corporations at large? As shown by the data above, US corporations were also experiencing a downwards sloping rate of change in their after tax profits.

US Durable Goods:

Given the nature of durable goods, which serve longer term purposes for businesses, this data serves as an excellent forward looking indicator for the confidence and outlook of manufacturers on the economy. Although it is not a smooth curve by any means, this data demonstrates a cyclical peak in 2017 that was downwards trending ever since. It even hit a negative mark pre-COVID.

Core Capital Goods Orders:

Very similar to durable goods, core capital goods orders are an excellent leading indicator for how confident businesses are, and their desire to expand. Unlike durable goods, this peaked in 2018, but was similarly in a downwards trend pre-COVID.

Kansas City Fed Manufacturing:

Source: Kansas City Fed

Lastly, this very helpful data from the Kansas City Fed helps to point out yet again how the U.S. economy peaked, in growth terms, around the second quarter of 2018.

This data, unlike durable and capital goods orders, represents a qualitative take on manufacturing. Nonetheless, through a qualitative lens, it still shares insights about the economic outlook that firms have and their plans for expanding. Yet again, a slowing rate of change from mid-2018 raised the probability that this mark would turn negative, which it did almost a year before COVID-19.

Future Works:

After completing this work, I realize that my knowledge on corporate debt, and how to look at debt cycles overall, can improve a lot. As a result, that is something I am going to study much more in depth, and produce a piece on that matter in the future (by the end of 2020 ideally).

Conclusion:

I cannot speak to the reasons why some may claim that the sole culprit or overwhelming factor behind this economic downturn is COVID-19, but I assume that they are likely being prisoners of the moment, and not looking at the underlying economic trends. I used at least one chart for every one of these topics because it is my belief that these economic indicators should be measured and mapped across longer term time frames, in order to understand how they are changing.

With all that being said, it is fair to criticize this piece for its simplicity and perhaps overemphasis on rate of change. The reason why I wrote it this way was because of my overall limited knowledge on many of these topics, but also because I understand how powerful this concept is when looking at economic data.

Options: Cash Secured Put

Facts:

  • You sell a put at a certain strike price, where you do not mind purchasing the security if it were to be exercised
  • Similar to the buy-write, ideally you want to sell puts at high levels of volatility, in order to earn a higher premium
  • “Cash-secured” = You will have the necessary cash in your account to own the security if the buyer of the option where to exercise it
  • It provides an alternative to setting a limit buy
    • While a limit buy order at a price below the current market price may never get filled, this strategy at least provides a means to gain minimal income
  • Maximum Gain –> Premium
  • Maximum Loss –> Strike Price – Premium

Bias:

Bullish Bias on an intermediate or longer term duration

  • Essentially you want to be long of a security, but its price is a bit excessive at the moment. As a result, you sell a put at a lower price and earn an income while waiting for the stock to potentially drop to those levels. This premium reduces your cost basis if you were to be assigned the security.

The Implications of ZIRP in 2020

For clarification, ZIRP refers to a central bank’s policy of setting their short term interest rates at 0 to 25 basis points. It represents one of a central bank’s strongest tools to spur economic activity, and is reserved for extreme circumstances, e.g., The Great Depression, Great Recession, and this Coronavirus shutdown in 2020. For a greater explanation, follow this link (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/031815/what-zero-interestrate-policy-zirp.asp)

With that said, what does this policy mean in 2020 in terms of leverage?:

Firstly, as with any reduction in interest rate, it is supposed to incentivize borrowing and investments on the part of business and consumers. It means that we are going to be taking out more debt (consumers, businesses, and governments alike), since it is going to be much cheaper than in previous years. To this point, I think it would be prudent to take a look at the debt outstanding in the United States. Currently, the total public debt to US GDP ratio stands in excess of 106%, which represents historic highs (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S). In addition, the private debt to GDP ratio stands at almost at 197%, which although is high, is not in the range of the highs in the Great Recession. Look for both these numbers to rise so long as we have ZIRP, and with this $2 Trillion stimulus package that was just passed by the federal government. A more leveraged economy, in my view, is dangerous once it becomes overloaded. Debtors suffer and that carries over to creditors, who are now unable to make money on their investments. The extent to which the Fed carries out ZIRP will tell us how much more leveraged our economy will become.

What caused ZIRP to come back and will it be effective?:

With the Coronavirus situation, it is something unprecedented in our country’s history. What you typically find is that economic downturns are a result of slowing demand, but in this case it is a shutdown on the supply side. Thousands (or millions) of businesses are unable to work at full capacity, unemployment claims reached all time highs, and we are poised for negative GDP growth in Q2 of 2020. This is an extremely serious economic condition (besides the very obvious health issues that take top priority) that requires both a fiscal and monetary response, unless we want the possibility of something like the 1930’s. However, is monetary policy really capable of turning us around?

Monetary policy in the United States and across the world has been extremely dovish. The ECB and BOJ have been using ZIRP (actually going further with negative rates) and in the United States we have been at relatively low rates for the past decade plus. This is significant because the hundred and fifty basis point drop that we had very recently is not some incredible figure. For context, the Fed Fund Rate was cut five hundred basis points to combat the Great Recession in 2008. What this shows, in my estimation, is that the monetary response will not be as effective as it was a decade ago, and fiscal stimulus will have to pick up a lot of the slack.

I think we even have a lot of evidence that the monetary response will not be as effective. In the days after the Fed has made their announcements regarding ZIRP, and even stronger QE measures, the stock market has failed to pick up much momentum. For example, when the Fed made the announcement on Sunday, March 15th, the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones fell substantially the following day.

Impact on Bonds and Equities:

Something very important to consider is the type of investments that low interest rates incentivize, and that is non-debt investments such as stocks. It makes less sense to tie one’s money to fixed income, when yields will be so low, and real yields might even be negative, as 10 Year Treasuries are as of today (3/28/20). I mean if you already had bonds then this could be a good move at least in the short term, since the value of outstanding bonds with a higher nominal interest rate will see their prices rise, but for newly issued bonds, that might not be the case.

On the other hand, with stocks, it is well noted that a drop in interest rates will increase the present value of companies by lowering the value by which their future cash flows are discounted, given that the cost of debt will drop and risk-free rate will change. Could it be a once in a lifetime buying opportunity? Perhaps. Yet could we soon see again a market that is heavily overpriced, with reduced future returns fueled by lower interest rates, yes. Only time will tell what happens, but it should be a tremendous experience. Personally, after taking a look at the work that the people at Bridgewater have produced regarding “Paradigm Shifts”, observing this next decade and analyzing how it differs from the 2010’s should prove to be a great learning experience.

Risks/Further Impact of ZIRP:

  1. Liquidity Trap

A liquidity trap is defined as when low interest rates are paired with a population who prefers to save their money, rather than spending that money or investing it in higher yielding investments. This is a risk in that a liquidity trap would essentially mean that monetary policy won’t be able to have as great of an impact on stimulating the economy. Japan could be a prime example of this, and is a worthwhile example to examine at a future time.

2. Lending from Banks

Something to consider when looking at the impact of ZIRP is how that affects banks. A bank, in order to properly operate, must choose where it allocates its capital. Whether it be holding it as excess reserve with the Fed and receiving interest on that, or investing it in treasuries, giving out loans to other banks, etc. Historically, when rates have been higher, the opportunity cost of not lending out that money and earning interest was too great. Hence, that explains why banks often had little to no excess reserves with the Fed for a long time (Reference: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/EXCSRESNS). However, when rates are pushed so low, and with the Fed paying interest on all reserves (since late 2008), it makes more sense that banks put more into their reserves. This has been the case since 2008, when we previously saw ZIRP. I think this could be a negative in two ways. For one, if the banks are raising their excess reserves, then that symbolizes money that is not being added to the money supply via their power as the fractional banking system. If the intent is to inject liquidity into the market, then this low interest rate policy could be backfiring in this way. Another possible risk is that of higher levels of inflation. Since banks hold such an incredible amount of cash on reserve, they could now theoretically have a lot of power to inadvertently cause greater levels of inflation in the future when they do decide to take it out of their reserves. These are just some things to consider, and we will see how they play out.

Well, this is all I have for now. I will make sure to provide updates on this once I get a better understanding of this matter, and as we see more real world impact in the near future.

Gold Moving Forward

Gold’s Basic Facts:

  • Commodity
  • Used as a holder for wealth
  • Denominated in US Dollars
  • ETF Ticker: GLD (SPDR Gold Trust)
  • Beta of ~ 0 with the S&P 500, which means that it moves both up and down with the stock market. This is due to the fact that unlike stocks, gold is not necessarily tied to the actions of the larger market, and thus serves as a solid diversifier to a variety of portfolios.
  • In reality, gold is more correlated to REAL INTEREST RATES, which will a strong focus of this article

Macroeconomic Perspective:

With the current economic environment, I believe that gold is in a prime position to perform well. Chief among these factors is the unlimited Quantitative Easing (QE) policy that the Fed has chosen to implement as of this past week. This is significant because it does a couple of things:

  1. Pushes nominal rates down
  2. Makes it more likely that inflation will increase (due to the substantial increase in the money supply due to monetization of debt and printing of money)

These are significant because of the connection that the two have with gold. This comes via real interest rates. Real interest rates are equal to nominal interest rates minus inflation. That is the very simplified version, but in principal it still applies. Quantitative Easing includes a 0% interest rate policy from the central bank. This, in turn, affects mortgage and commercial bank rates, as well as bond yields. These should push real interest rates down, especially if inflation picks up.

I believe inflation will be at least slightly on the upside as a result of QE. Earlier this week, the Fed announced their intentions to ramp up their actions by purchasing an even larger sum of government and mortgage-backed securities. Previously, they had committed to monetizing $500 billion(!) in U.S. Treasuries and $200(!) billion in mortgage-backed securities over the next several months. The QE infinity that is about to ensue may make those numbers look like nothing. The Fed will also be buying CORPORATE bonds for the first time in history. All this will go a long ways to increasing the money supply, and if output is unable to match these increases, then higher inflation is on the table. I do not believe that anything like hyperinflation is on the table, but I am expecting some rise in inflation.

Ultimately, this is to say that as asset classes, such as 10 year treasuries, produce low or negative real returns, then it makes sense for investors to store their capital elsewhere, and that includes gold. For reference, real yields on the 10 Year Treasury stood at 0.17 on Friday March 20th, and a week later and after the announcement, they fell to -0.22 on Friday the 27th (Reference: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=realyield).

How has it played out in the market so far?

While there was an initial drop in gold, you have already begun to see people flock to the precious metal (https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-sparks-a-global-gold-rush-11585332624). This initial drop in gold is largely due to the known fact that in times of severe crisis, all asset correlations approach 1, and this is because investors even have to sell their gold in order to cover their margin calls. However, and as the WSJ reports, various large institutions have made sure to secure their gold.

What are others saying?

  1. Goldman Sachs came out and doubled down on their bullish take on gold (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-says-it-is-time-to-buy-gold-the-currency-of-last-resort-2020-03-24).

A Word of Caution:

The performance of gold, as I have tried to emphasize, relies on how real interest rates perform. My view is that they will drop for the foreseeable future, and that is why I would be bullish on gold. Nominal rates will play their part, as the Fed and its QE Infinity will see to that, yet inflation is more of the wild card. There is a possibility that lower commodity and oil prices, as well as a weakening economy could actually create a deflationary pressure. If this is severe enough, then real rates will behave differently than what I expect.

Last note:

This is my personal take, and this does not serve as investment advice. I publish these to organize and share my own thoughts, and are not intended to be used as investment advice.

For further reading, check out these sources. They really helped me a lot! Also check out Ray Dalio’s LinkedIn post regarding Paradigm Shifts. It’s vital to understand that what has worked in the past, especially in the near past does not guarantee future success (actually far from it).

https://www.kitco.com/commentaries/2019-10-07/Gold-it-s-all-about-real-rates-not-the-dollar.html

Options: Buy-Write

So I recently began an investment challenge in a mentorship program I am in, and I wanted to share what it was about and how the strategy works.

Facts:

  • A buy-write strategy involves buying an equity, yet simultaneously selling a call against it
  • A trader would employ this strategy when they are neutral to slightly bullish on the equity
  • It is very important to use volatility to your advantage
  • 1 option contract requires 100 shares of stock
  • An option such as selling a call is a primary example of an investment derivative that provides asymmetric return for an investor, i.e. while it does cap the profit potential, it also serves to minimize potential losses (While having unlimited upside might sound very attractive, a sophisticated trader understands the importance of maximizing opportunities of high probability, lower-profit opportunities)

Context:

This competition should be really interesting considering the markets are still trying to adjust to the impact of COVID-19 on supply chains and global economies, as well as the Democratic primaries here domestically. I think the combination of these two serves to raise the implied volatility in the markets, and thus could provide an opportunity to sell calls.

How I am approaching this challenge:

One of the main rules of the competition is that we must write a call on 50-100% of our positions. For the sake of simplicity and consistency, I will write 100% of my shares. I think this could prove to be a valuable learning experience, and will update this post accordingly.

Update (7/30/20):

Thanks to the help of my peers and mentors, I was able to earn first place in the competition!

1/22/20

https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/investment-ideas/what-is-factor-investing/factor-commentary/andrews-angle/growth-is-not-the-opposite-of-value

I became aware of Andrew Ang’s work when I recently listened to him in an interview with Barry Ritholtz on his podcast, Masters in Business (Bloomberg Opinion). I learned a lot about what factor investing is, and it is something I will explore more in depth soon.

I then decided to read more of his work, and it led me to this article published on BlackRock’s site, where he discusses value vs growth investing. I always had this notion that value and growth were complete opposites, but Dr. Ang does an excellent job of disproving this, and showing how the two can work together. Essentially, the ideal investment would contain the growth attributes of quality and positive-momentum (which have shown long-term returns), but is purchased at a price substantially below its intrinsic value (value investing aspect). It was a great read, and I look forward to reading more of his work.

12/18/19

https://www.morningstar.com/articles/932740/how-to-become-a-duration-detective

I was reading this article and I found it to be very insightful. Essentially, it illustrates how, unlike equities, you can’t just look at the % of Net Assets that bonds hold within a portfolio to understand its true weight/impact on returns. To get a much greater understanding you have to look at the % of total duration for that bond in the portfolio, since it gives a better look at the inherent risks that each bond holds in its unique interest rate environment.

This points to something even larger and it is that in order to make good comparisons between performances of bond funds, you have to make sure that the funds are even comparable. This involves looking at how they invest across sectors, seeing if the duration of those investments are similar, etc.

All in all, this article is a great read to learn more about the importance of duration.

12/3/19

Post Link

I read this blog post from Tony DeSpirito, a Managing Director at BlackRock, and found his insight to be fascinating.

At the end of the day, fundamentals > … when looking at investing in equities for the long-term. We have to be willing to stomach some headlines and be true to our fundamental analysis in order to maximize our chances for success in our investment.

Please give this a read, it even includes really insightful and easy-to-understand graphics.

11/26/19

I was on LinkedIn and came across this post from PIMCO. It summarizes how their asset allocation will be altered, given the expected economic slowdown in the United States. Essentially, in times like this, they value higher quality securities and a more defensive position. Here is the link to the post:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pimco_investing-markets-recession-activity-6605108132886786048-qxz7

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started